The View from Washington: the SEC’s New Rules Defining Venture Capital Funds

 
Public Policy
July 12, 2011 Posted by:

I just returned from SVB's Leadership Summit for venture capital and private equity CFOs, where I had the opportunity to facilitate several discussions about new regulations affecting the venture capital and private equity arenas. We were "fortunate" enough to be meeting the day after the SEC announced their new rules defining venture capital funds. This definition will determine which fund managers will have to begin registering with the SEC next spring – venture capital funds won't have to take this step, while private equity funds will.

As you can imagine, the conversation was fairly intense as we all grappled to understand the new ruling and what it means for all of us within the innovation ecosystem. In a nutshell, the new rule defines "venture capital fund" for the purposes of the exemption as a private fund that (1) invests no more than 20 percent of capital commitments in non-qualifying investments, (2) does not borrow or incur leverage, (3) does not offer its investors redemption or other similar liquidity rights except in extraordinary circumstances, (4) represents itself a pursing a venture capital strategy, and (5) is not registered under the Investment Company Act and has not elected to be treated as a business development company.

Overall, I thought the SEC did a really good job listening to the feedback SVB, the NVCA, and many others provided. Their final rules incorporated a number of changes that make a lot of sense. We were heartened, for example, to see that the final rules provide flexibility to let venture funds and their portfolio companies use debt in ways that are consistent with the venture model (as opposed to buyout financing), and recognize the difference between a venture fund staying with a company once it goes public and a private equity fund buying shares in an existing, public company.

I'm proud to believe that SVB played a part in the SEC's decision, by filing comments and providing our perspectives to the policymakers. We did this as part of our broader effort to engage on public policy issues that we believe will meaningfully affect the innovation ecosystem and the ability of our clients to succeed.

We'll continue to work with our private equity clients as they work to comply with the new custody rules. More broadly, we'll continue to work to educate policymakers about the effect policies, laws and regulations have on the innovation sector, and why this sector is so critical to the United States' long term economic growth and competitiveness. But for today, it's great to see that when we all step forward, we can work together to move things in a positive direction.

Comment

Not a Member?
Register now and join discussions in the SVB Professional network. Best of all, it's FREE.

Register Login to Comment

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy