Taxes: A Rational Approach?

 
Economic Outlook
June 30, 2009 Posted by:
You know, sometimes, I don't know why
But this old town just seems so hopeless
I ain't really sure, but it seems I remember the good times
Were just a little bit more in focus

-Tom Petty


It's difficult to deny the divide in Washington these days. It seems perhaps the divide wasn't so wide long ago. But then it's easy to rewrite history as romantic and the grass always does seem greener in hindsight.

For my entire adult life I've been told that Americans need to consume less and save more. I've also been told that income taxes need to be either increased or decreased. Many also have argued for more government spending, while others believe government should be as small as possible.

It's funny, but the arguments align consistently along political party lines, no matter the state of the economy (though it is true politicians don't always "do" as they "say").

It is interesting the consumer savings rate reached 6.9 percent in May for the first time since December 1993. However, this is most likely a reflection of fear on the consumer's part rather than a decided and ongoing change in behavior.

Regarding taxes, arguing for ever-increasing tax rates is as silly as arguing for ever decreasing tax rates. Instead, we must realize the "appropriate" tax revenue rate adjusts over time. As the economy weakens, tax revenue becomes less important than turning the economy around. As the economy strengthens, we must pay for previous shortfalls by increasing tax revenue.

Notice I am targeting tax revenue and not tax rates.

Reaching back to our high school economics class (they still teach this stuff in high school, don't they?) we recall a concept called "utility." Utility is the total satisfaction received at a certain level of activity. Remember the old cliché of the child caught smoking whose father then locks him in a closet with a carton of cigarettes until they are gone? Fire safety aside, his parents certainly teach him a lesson by increasing the quantity of product until the utility received from smoking becomes negative.

In the nearby chart, you can see a possible utility curve for the marginal tax rate. In this illustration, utility is the revenue government receives for a certain level of taxation. You can see the curve is sloped on both sides, meaning that to get to the top of the utility curve you may have to either increase or decrease the marginal tax rate depending upon where you start.


Source: SVB Asset Management

In this specific graph it seems the tax rate should be lowered in order to maximize tax revenue. However, this is entirely dependant on where the utility curve lies.

For example, take a look at Possible Scenario #2. If this utility curve is correct, then an increase in taxes may be in order.
Source: SVB Asset Management

The crux of the "tax" discussion should be where the curve lies today. Are we on the up slope or the down slope? Instead, the issue is obscured by emotion and selfish viewpoints.

Government spending is a topic for another day. But consider this: The last time income taxes covered such a small portion of government spending was 1945. In fact, the only times taxes were less effective in addressing spending than today were the end of World War I, the Great Depression and the end of World War II.

Simply put, raising tax revenue alone will not significantly drive the budget deficit towards zero. There will have to be cutbacks in spending at some point.

Key Developments

Consumer confidence declined in June to 49.3 after spiking from 40.8 in April to 54.8 in May. Much of the recent increase is due to improvement in the "expectations" index as opposed to the "present situation" index. The recent market rally has surely driven consumers' feelings toward the positive.

Construction spending fell in May by 0.9 percent after unexpectedly rising 0.8 percent in April. The effects of the federal stimulus package on this sector are making it quite difficult to forecast. The bounceback expected in May has now been pushed forward.

Nonfarm payrolls decreased by 467,000 in June, over 100,000 more than expected on the Street. The unemployment rate rose slightly to 9.5 percent, up 70 percent from 12 months ago. Total net job losses in this downturn now total close to 6.5 million since January 2008.

Comment

Not a Member?
Register now and join discussions in the SVB Professional network. Best of all, it's FREE.

Register Login to Comment

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy