No Pain, No Gain?

 
Economic Outlook
May 26, 2009 Posted by:
First I was afraid
I was petrified
Kept thinking I could never live
Without you by my side
But I spent so many nights
Thinking how you did me wrong
I grew strong
I learned how to carry on

- Gloria Gaynor

If you've ever been in love, you've probably known heartache. Looking back, you may realize the bad times are what make the good times so good. Or, you may wish you could only experience the good times and leave the bad behind. In either case, your feelings are not too different from market watchers today.

Given all markets move in cycles with good times followed by bad, it's easy to see there are two ways to look forward from the bad times. One, realize the pain we feel now only partially offsets the advances achieved in the good times leaving a net-positive outcome. Or two, realize the pain we feel now is greater than the advances received in the good times implying some sort of mutation of the cycle is in order. Naturally, these two courses lead to differing outcomes which will drive future productivity trends.

The debate going on today regarding more or less regulation and larger or smaller government is reflective of the two viewpoints above. Historically, the drive to increase or decrease government regulation has also been cyclical, but it is difficult to deny the long-term trend toward additional government since this country's founding.

The first viewpoint above stresses the advances that result from improved productivity over the pain experienced when bubbles burst. This is a kind of caveat emptor philosophy, implying it is up to individuals to realize these cycles occur and to navigate accordingly.

It could be said the second is a more risk averse viewpoint, attempting to avoid the downside of cyclical behavior at the expense of economic and societal gains achieved in the boom times.

This chart shows gross domestic product (GDP) per individual based in 2000 dollars, thus removing inflationary effects. Over time, economic advantages have far outweighed economic costs as measured by the growth in GDP per capita over the last half-century or so even as boom/bust cycles have come and gone. It could be argued the current capitalist model allowing labor and capital to flow toward best-NPV (net present value) uses, unhindered by excessive government regulation, has allowed this statistic to nearly triple in the last fifty years.

Today, I see the following four categories of potential increased government involvement in daily corporate life: oversight of executive compensation; management of large industrial and financial corporations; encouraging risk-taking by providing a government safety net (reduction of the moral hazard); and the authority to overtake corporations before they become a systemic risk.

None of these are marginal changes. These are radical concepts that will potentially be put in place soon and seemingly without recourse. The question before the American people is: Does the pain we are feeling now justify such a broad overhaul of American business to risk a potential tripling of our economic lifestyle over the next fifty years?

Key Developments

Housing starts unexpectedly slid 13 percent in April to an annual rate of 458,000. The second consecutive monthly decline has left starts at the lowest level in 59 years. The high unemployment rate will mute a rebound in this sector despite the supply of new properties being below the rate of households being created

Minutes from the April 28-29 FOMC meeting were released on May 20 and the committee noted there are signs that the pace of contraction was slowing although near-term economic recovery will be modest. The committee also expects that unemployment would remain elevated and inflationary pressures remain subdued largely attributable to the low level of capacity utilization. Should the pace of recovery become sluggish, several members reaffirmed their commitment to expanding the Fed's balance sheet.

SolarWinds, Inc. and OpenTable, Inc. both traded higher on the day of their initial public offering as public investors show a healthy appetite for IPOs. The offerings snapped an IPO freeze dating back to the last quarter of 2008. SolarWinds raised $151.5 million and OpenTable raised $60 million.

Comment

Not a Member?
Register now and join discussions in the SVB Professional network. Best of all, it's FREE.

Register Login to Comment

Terms of Service | Privacy Policy