FX Outlook
November 18, 2008 Posted by:
Dave Bhagat
The leaders of the G20 countries met in Washington over the
weekend. Collectively, their economies make up 90 percent of global
GDP and consequently, are more representative of the global economy
than the G8, which no longer has the economic and political
dominance it did when the name was formally coined in 1997 upon the
inclusion of Russia.
Expectations were low for a meaningful outcome and the outcome
largely matched those expectations. The statement that followed
their five-hour meeting on Saturday called for a broader policy
response to recent events and made a plea for lower interest rates,
lower taxes and more government spending in the weeks and months
ahead. Each country was asked to respond to their individual set of
conditions as they saw fit.
Other "noteworthy" items included: a call for more ammunition and
a larger toolkit for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), a
promise not to erect new trade barriers, a March 31, 2009 deadline
for new recommendations on greater market oversight and regulation,
tighter accounting standards and improved functioning of the credit
derivatives market. They said they would meet again in April to
review their progress on decisions made on November 15. Several
countries including France were pressing for explicit steps towards
a centralized global authority to oversee financial markets, but
the U.S. was not supportive. Faced with a choice between more
market support and greater controls, the group chose to mention
both, with slightly greater emphasis on supportive measures in the
near-term.
While the list of action items and expressions of harmony and
cooperation sounded impressive, the statement has no real teeth,
nor was it ever likely to. Mr. Bush brings new meaning to the
phrase "lame duck president", given his approval ratings and the
election results. Mr. Obama stayed away, even though his
lieutenants were sent to keep an eye on the proceedings. It is more
than likely that he will put his own stamp on global coordination
shortly after January 20. It is also likely that if financial
markets implode again, some of the emerging markets represented at
the table (Russia, India, China, Brazil, Mexico, Saudi Arabia,
South Africa, Turkey, South Korea, Argentina and Indonesia) will
take unilateral action that might well fly in the face of
Saturday's communiqué.
Finally, with a dominant and increasingly vocal Democratic
majority, an economy in a downward spiral, an automobile industry
on life support and our trade deficit with China continuing to
soar, it may not be long before protectionist sentiment rears its
head once again. The Doha Round of the World Trade Organization was
given verbal support, but it is doubtful whether it will ultimately
yield meaningful results.
The road ahead
The dollar and JPY rallied towards the end of last week, as
weakness in the equity markets undermined sentiment. Heightened
risk aversion benefited those two currencies, following the pattern
established in recent months. Overall, the dollar's pace of
appreciation has slowed, but not the direction. In my opinion, the
dollar's strength is increasingly only a function of position
liquidation and risk aversion now, and not a reflection of
underlying fundamentals.
Earlier, it was helped by a downward repricing of European growth
and a realization that even Asia was vulnerable. Most forecasts now
see a deep recession in the UK, with rates falling to one percent
(currently three percent) and Europe falling into recession as
well, with the ECB likely to cut rates to below two percent
(currently 3.25 percent). Currency positions probably reflect these
revised forecasts or soon will. Therefore, once the deleveraging
process ends, there is likely to be little fundamental support for
further USD gains. I suspect most hedge fund liquidation to fund
2008 redemptions will end shortly; other flows will depend on the
performance of equity markets.
Predicting the timing of a trend reversal for the dollar is
difficult, as it depends on many factors. However, with financial
markets appearing to be on the path to (relative) stability and
global economic forecasts converging gradually towards a consensus
view of subpar 2009 growth for the global economy (and negative
growth for the major economies for the first time since World War
II), equity volatility should abate over the next few months. I
expect the dollar to turn in the first quarter of 2009, but the
pace and magnitude is likely to vary by currency.
The GBP has been especially hard hit and there are reasons for GBP
weakness to continue in the short-term: a deep recession,
deleveraging of the most leveraged consumer society outside the
U.S. and lower rates. However, there is also reason to expect the
economy to recover somewhat sooner, thanks to a proactive Bank of
England. The euro's fall has been less severe, but it is likely its
rebound will be slower, as the European Central Bank is behind the
curve and needs to play catch-up. In my opinion, the stronger Asian
currencies will lead the pack as their banks are largely unscathed,
reserves remain adequate and economic growth (and interest rates)
should rebound sharply once global demand recovers. The JPY is
stronger than its economic fundamentals justify and will probably
underperform as risk appetite returns and equities stabilize.
Overall, I expect the dollar to make new highs (or retest recent
highs) over the next couple of months. I think it will be weaker by
the end of 2009 - just barely vs. the euro, more sharply vs. some
of the Asian currencies and somewhere in between for most others.
In my opinion, any dollar gains between now and the end of 2009
will be limited to the JPY and some of the weaker emerging market
currencies, whose economies will continue to suffer from the
fallout of the financial crisis.
E-mail This
The following excerpt will be included in your message.
Last Weekend's G20 MeetingOctober 22, 2012 Posted by: Dave BhagatThe leaders of the G20 countries met in Washington over theweekend. Collectively, their economies make up 90 percent of globalGDP and consequently, are more representative of the global economythan the G8, which no longer has the economic and politicaldominance it did when the name was formally coined in 1997 upon theinclusion of Russia.
Expectations were low for a meaningful outcome and the outcomelargely matched those expectations. The statement that followedtheir five-hour meeting on Saturday called for a broader policyresponse to recent events and made a plea for lower interest rates,lower taxes and more government spending in the weeks and monthsahead. Each country was asked to respond to their individual set ofconditions as they saw fit.
Other "noteworthy" items included: a call for more ammunition anda larger toolkit for the International Monetary Fund (IMF), apromise not to erect new trade barriers, a March 31, 2009 deadlinefor new recommendations on greater market oversight and regulation,tighter accounting standards and improved functioning of the creditderivatives market. They said they would meet again in April toreview their progress on decisions...
Read More